Comments on: Image Site Rage Act III – Failing, are they? Failing, are they? Well, let ‘em fail! http://jinx.fi/2010/01/27/image-site-rage-act-iii-failing-are-they-failing-are-they-well-let-em-fail/ The Jinxed Miko Enterprise Thu, 09 Sep 2010 05:43:03 +0300 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Kljigen http://jinx.fi/2010/01/27/image-site-rage-act-iii-failing-are-they-failing-are-they-well-let-em-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-683 Kljigen Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:36:07 +0000 http://jinx.fi/?p=1604#comment-683 More like Ultimate Flatchest Works. More like Ultimate Flatchest Works.

]]> By: Nicd http://jinx.fi/2010/01/27/image-site-rage-act-iii-failing-are-they-failing-are-they-well-let-em-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-679 Nicd Wed, 27 Jan 2010 07:06:23 +0000 http://jinx.fi/?p=1604#comment-679 ULTIMATE BREAST WORKS! ULTIMATE BREAST WORKS!

]]> By: Ryan A http://jinx.fi/2010/01/27/image-site-rage-act-iii-failing-are-they-failing-are-they-well-let-em-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-675 Ryan A Wed, 27 Jan 2010 00:09:48 +0000 http://jinx.fi/?p=1604#comment-675 PNG sources I say! And dynamic resize (with garbage collection) to jpeg... there's really no reason to have 100% jpeg at less than 640x480, but... at the same time, there's no reason to have less than 90% jpeg on just about anything. O.o PNG sources I say! And dynamic resize (with garbage collection) to jpeg… there’s really no reason to have 100% jpeg at less than 640×480, but… at the same time, there’s no reason to have less than 90% jpeg on just about anything.

O.o

]]>